Qualche riferimento bibliografico

Belchior, M. (2014). Brazil investment opportunities. Convention on Biological Diversity, Minister of State—Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/.

2. Câmara de Comércio Italo-Brasileira. (2012). Produzione dell’energia in Brasile—Aspetti tecnici, economici ed ambientali. BIP, São Paulo.
   
   

   Caravaggio, N., Iorio, M. (2016). Management of water resources in the Amazon region. Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design, 279-292.
3. Cauti, C. (2015). Perché il Brasile di Dilma ha smesso di crescere, Limes on-line, May 27, 2015. Available at: http://www.limesonline.com/perche-il-brasile-di-dilma-ha-smesso-di-crescere/77412.
4. Comité Brasileiro Das Barragens (CBDB). (2011). A história das barragens no Brasil—Séculos XIX, XX XXI—Cinquenta años do Comité Brasileiro de Barragens. Rio de Janeiro.
5. Da Silva, P., Marin Neto, A. J., Ferreira, P. F. P., Camargo, J. C., Apolinário, F. R., & Pinto, C. S. (2005). Analysis of hydrogen production from combined photovoltaics, wind energy and secondary hydroelectricity supply in Brazil. Solar Energy, 78(5), 670–677.

   CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. ELETROBRÁS. (2014). Relatório Anual e de Sustentabilidade 2013.
7. ELETROBRÁS/ELETRONORTE. (2011). Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2011.
8. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (EPE). (2009). UHE BELO MONTE AVALIAÇÃO TÉCNICA. Apresentação Geral da Otimização do Empreendimento. No EPE-DEE-RE-046/2009-r0, Ministério de Minas e Energia, 21 Sept, 2009.
9. Empresa de Pesquisa Energética (EPE). (2012). Projeção da demanda de energia elétrica para os próximos 10 anos (2013–2022). Ministério de Minas e Energia.
10. Fearnside, P. M. (1999). Social impacts of Brazil’s Tucuruí Dam. Environmental Management,24(4), 483–495.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fearnside, P. M. (2000). Greenhouse gas emissions from a hydroelectric reservoir (Brazil’s Tucuruí Dam) and the energy policy implications. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, no, 133, 69–96.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Fearnside, P. M. (2001). Environmental impacts of Brazil’s Tucuruí Dam: Unlearned lessons for hydroelectric development in Amazonia. Environmental Management, 27(3), 377–396.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Fearnside, P. M. (2004). Greenhouse gas emissions from hydroelectric dams: controversies provide a springboard for rethinking a supposedly ‘clean’ energy source. Climatic change, 66, 1–8.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Goldstein, A., & Trebeschi, G. (2014). Il prossimo balzo in avanti del Brasile. Aspenia 64, March 2014.
15. International Energy Agency (IEA). (2012). Energy Technology Perspectives, 2010. Scenarios & Strategies to 2050, OECD/IEA, 2010.
16. Júnior, D. S., & Reid, W. C. J. (2010). Uncertainties in amazon hydropower development: Risk scenarios and environmental issues around the belo monte dam. Water Alternatives, 3(2), 249–268.

    Google Scholar
17. Manyari, W. V., & De Carvalho, O. A. (2007). Environmental considerations in energy planning for the Amazon region: Downstream effects of dams. Energy Policy, 35, 6526–6534.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
    Monni, S. (2015) “Aguasocial – Un progetto per la gestione delle risorse idriche nell’Amazzonia brasiliana”, in Roma Tre News 2/2015 pp. 20-22,  21 Dicembre 2015.
18. Nepstad, D., Soares-Filho, B. S., Merry, F., Lima, A., Moutinho, P., Carter, J., et al. (2009). The end of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Science, 326(5958), 1350–1351.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). OECD Economic Surveys Brazil, Oct 2013. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/Brazil_2013_Overview_ENG.pdf.
20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2014). OECD Factbook 2014. Economic, Environmental and Social Statistics. May 06, 2014.
21. Pinto, L. F. (2011). Tucuruí—A barragem da ditadura. Belém: Edição Jornal Pessoal.

    Google Scholar
22. Pinto, L. F. (2012). De Tucuruí a Belo Monte: a história avança mesmo?. Boletim do Museo Paraense Emílio Goeldi. Ciências Humanas, vol. 7, n°3, September-December 2012.
23. Rocha, G. D. M. (2008). Todos convergem para o lago!—Hidrelétrica de Tucuruí. NUMA/UFPA, Belém: Municípios e Territórios na Amazônia.

    Google Scholar
24. Steinhurst, W., Knight, P., & Shultz, M. (2012). Hydropower Greenhouse Gas Emissions. State of the research. Synapse: Energy Economics Inc.

    Google Scholar
25. Survival International. (2010). Il ritorno delle grandi dighe. Una grave minaccia al futuro dei popoli indigeni. Available at: http://assets.survivalinternational.org/documents/375/Rapporto_Survival_Grandi_Dighe.pdf.
26. Teodoru, Cristian, Prairie, Yves, & del Giorgio, Paul. (2010). Spatial heterogeneity of surface CO2 fluxes in a newly created Eastmain-1 reservoir in Northern Quebec Canada. Ecosystems,14, 28–46.

    CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Trindade, S. T, Jr, Barbosa, E. J., De Fugereido, A. M., & Tavares, G. (2014). ATLAS Escola do Pará. Altamira: UFPA. 2014.

    Google Scholar
28. Tundisi, J. G., Goldemberg, J., Matsumura-Tundisi, T. & Saraiva, A. C. F. (2014). How many more dams in the Amazon?. Energy Policy, 74, Nov 2014, 703–708.
29. United Nations (UN). (2012). Biodiversity in Brazil—Fact sheet. Conference on Biological Diversity (COP11), Oct 2012.
30. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2014). UNDP Human Development Report 2014. Sustaining human progress: reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. United Nations. Available at: http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2014.
31. Volpi, G. (2007). Climate mitigation, deforestation and human development in Brazil. Human Development Report 2007, occasional paper.
32. World Commission on Dams (WCD). (2000). Dams and development—A new framework for decision-making. London, November: Earthscan. 2000.

    Google Scholar